Чарльз Эндрейн - Сравнительный анализ политических систем
35
См.: Theda Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 67—81, 147—57, 236—83; Lucian W. Pye, «The State and the Individual: An Overview Interpretation», China Quarterly, no. 127 (September 1991): 443–65; James Townsend, «Chinese Nationalism», Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, no. 27 (January 1992): 97—130; Evelyn S. Rawski, «Research Themes in Ming–Qing Socioeconomic History— The State of the Field», Journal of Asian Studies 50 (February 1991): 84–111; Fairbank, China, 51–53, 96–101,176–86.
36
Edwin O. Reischauer and Albert M. Craig, Japan: Tradition and Transformation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978), 161.
37
Michio Morishima, «Ideology and Economic Activity», Current Sociology 38 (Autumn/Winter 1990): 51—77; Ronald P. Dore, «Economic and Social Development in East Asia and Confucian Culture», Comparative Studies on East Asia, no. 3 (March 1991) 14—15; Pan Jianxiong, «The Dual Structure of Chinese Culture and Its Influence on Modem Chinese Society», International Sociology 5 (March 1990): 75—88; Robert A. Scalapino, «Ideology and Modernization—the Japanese Case», in Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter (New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964), 93–127; Apter, The Politics of Modernization, 232—35: Barry Hindess, «Rationality and Modern Society», Sociological Theory 9 (Fall 1991): 217–18; Samuel P. Huntington and Jorge I. Dominguez, «Political Development», in Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3, ed. Greenstein and Polsby. 18—22.
38
См.: Mikiso Hane, Modern Japan: A Historical Survey (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986), 84–191; Reischauer and Craig, Japan, 133–89; Bradley M.Richardson and Scott C. Flanagan, Politics in Japan (Boston; Little, Brown, 1984), 1–28; Karel Van Wolferen, The Enigma of Japanese Power (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1989), 295–313, 375–83; Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions, 67–77, 100–104; Ramon H. Myers, «How Did the Modern Chinese Economy Develop? — A Review Article», Journal of Asian Studies 50 (August 1991): 604—28; and the following four essays in Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey, ed. Robert E. Ward and Dankwart A. Rustow (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964): Robert A. Scalapino, «Environmental and Foreign Contributions», 64—90; William W. Lockwood, «Economic and Political Modernization», 117–45; R. P. Dore, «Education», 176—204; Masamichi Inoki, «The Civil Bureaucracy», 283–300.
39
Hyun–Chin Lim, Dependent Development in the World–System: The Case of South Korea, 1963—1979 (Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Sociology, Harvard University, 1982), 80–83; The World Bank, World Development Report 1981 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), 137, 171; The World Bank, World Development Report 1983 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 191, 196–97; Parvez Hasan, Korea: Problems and Issues in a Rapidly Growing Economy (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).
40
Quee–Young Kim, «Korea's Confucian Heritage and Social Change», Journal of Developing Societies A (July–October 1988): 255—69; James B. Palasi, «Confucianism and the Aristocratic/Bureaucratic Balance in Korea», Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 44 (December 1984): 427–68.
41
Soohn–Ho Hong, «Bureaucracy in Korea», Korea Journal 20 (August 1980): 4—13, 20; Lim, Dependent Development, 45—128; Bruce Cumings, The Two Koreas (New York: Foreign Policy Association Headline Series, No. 294, Fall 1990): 7—39;. Whang In—Joung, «Administration of Land Reform in Korea, 1949—52», Korea Journal 24 (October 1984): 4—20; Hochul Lee, «Political Economy of Land Reforms in Korea and Bolivia: State and Class in Rural Structure», Asian Perspective 15 (Spring–Summer 1991): 219–21.
42
Quee–Young Kim, «Disjunctive Justice and Revolutionary Movements: The 4.19 (sa–il–gu) Upheaval and the Fall of the Syngman Rhee Regime in South Korea», Journal of Developing Societies 6 (January–April 1990): 56—70; Norman A. Graham, «The Role of the Military in the Political and Economic Development of the Republic of Korea», Journal of Asian and African Studies 26 (January–April 1991): 114—31.
43
Bruce Cumings, «The Abortive Abertura: South Korea in the Light of Latin American Experience», New Left Review, no. 173 (January–February 1989): 5—32; Hakjong Yoo, The Two Koreas: A Comparative Political Analysis of a Divided Nation (Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, New York University, 1977); Robert A. Kinney, «Students, Intellectuals, and the Churches: Their Roles in Korean Politics», Asian Affairs 8 (January–February 1981): 180—95; George Won and In–Hwan Oh, «Grass Roots Democracy: The Case of the Korean Labor Movement», Sociological Perspectives 26. (October 1983): 399–422; Hagen Koo and Doo–Seung Hong, «Class and Income Inequality in Korea», American Sociological Review 45 (August 1980): 610–26; Moon Kyu Park, «Interest Representation in South Korea», Asian Survey 27 (August 1987): 903–17; Bae–Ho Hahn, «The Role of the State in Development: The Korea Case», China Report 22 (July–September 1986): 289–306; James Cotton, «Understanding the State in South Korea: Bureaucratic–Authoritarian or State Autonomy Theory?» Comparative Political Studies 24 (January 1992): 512–31; Russell Mardon, «The State and the Effective Control of Foreign Capital: The Case of South Korea», World Politics 43 (October 1990): 111–38; James Petras and Po–Keung Hui, «State and Development in Korea and Taiwan», Studies in Political Economy, no. 34 (Spring 1991): 179–98; John Lie, «The Prospect for Economic Democracy in South Korea», Economic and Industrial Democracy 12 (November 1991): 501–13; John Lie, «The Political Economy of South Korean Development», International Sociology 1 (September 1992): 285–300; T.J.Pempel, «Of Dragons and Development», Journal of Public Policy 12 (January–March 1992): 79–95; Chang Yun–Shik, «The Personalist Ethic and the Market in Korea», Comparative Studies in Society and History 33 (January 1991): 106–29; Robert Wade, «East Asia's Economic Success: Conflicting Perspectives, Partial Insights, Shaky Evidence», World Politics (January 1992): 270–320.
44
The Democratic Movement in South Korea, «South Korea under Chun Doo–hwan: Analysis of Its Economy and Politics», Korea Scope 2 (September 1982): 3—36; James Cotton, «From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea», Political Studies 37 (June 1989): 244–59; Young Whan Kihl, «South Korea's Rise to Prominence», Current History 88 (April 1989): 165–68, 192–93; Cumings, «The Abortive Abertura», 24–32.
45
James S. Fishkin, Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991), 29–53; Raymond Duncan Gastil, «The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experiences and Suggestions», Studies in Comparative International Development 25 (Spring 1990): 25–50; John Keane, «Democracy and the Media», International Social Science Journal 43 (August 1991): 523–40; Arend Lijphart and Markus M. L. Crepaz, «Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages», British Journal of Political Science 21 (April 1991): 235–46.
46
См.: Keith Blackburn and Michael Christensen, «Monetary Policy and Policy Credibility: Theories and Evidence», Journal of Economic Literature 27 (March 1989): 5–7; Ernest Gellner, «Civil Society in Historical Context», International Social Science Journal^ (August 1991): 495–510.
47
David E. Apter, Introduction to Political Analysis (Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers, 1977), 255–68, 303–75.
48
См.: Raymond D. Gastil, Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties. 1987–1988 (New York: Freedom House, 1988), 54–65; Freedom House Survey Team, R. Bruce McColm, coordinator. Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1989–1990 (New York: Freedom House, 1990), 312–13; R. Bruce McColm, «The Comparative Survey of Freedom: 1992», Freedom Review 23 (January–February 1992): 5–24; Roberto P. Korzeniewicz and Kirnberley Awbrey, «Democratic Transitions and the Semiperiphery of the World–Economy», Sociological Forum 7 (December 1992): 620–29.
49
См.: Robert A. Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989), 232–64; Gellner, «Civil Society in Historical Context», 500–505; Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Evelyne Huber Stephens, and John D. Stephens, Capitalist Development and Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), esp. 1–11 40–78' 269–302.
50
Robert A. Dahl, «Governments and Political Oppositions», in Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3, ed. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1975), 120–22; Eva Etzioni–Halevy, «Democratic–Elite Theory; Stabilization versus Breakdown of Democracy», European Journal of Sociology 31 (November 1990V 317–50.
51
James G. March and Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1989), 143–72; Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics, 299–341.
52
David E. Apter, «Radicalization and Embourgeoisement: Some Hypotheses for a Comparative Study of History», Journal of Interdisciplinary History 1 (Winter 1971V 265–303.
53
Michael Coppedge and Wolfgang H. Reinicke, «Measuring Polyarchy», Studies in Comparative international Development 25 (Spring 1990): 51–72.
54
Krishan Kumar, «Class and Political Action in Nineteenth–Century England», European Journal of Sociology 24, no. 1 (1983); 3–43; Norman Gash, Politics in the Age of Peel (London: Longmans Green, 1953); Eugene С Black, ed., British Politics in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Walker and Company, 1969).
55
Rosemary H. T. O'Kane, «Military Regimes: Power and Force», European Journal of Political Research 27 (May 1989): 333–50.
56
См.: Amnesty International Report 1991 (London: Amnesty International Publications, 1991); Stephen F. Cohen, «What's Really Happening in Russia?» Nation 254 (March 2,1992); 259–68; World Opinion Update 15 (February 1991): 14–15, Donald S. Kellerman, Andrew Kohut, and Carol Bowman, The Pulse of Europe: A Survey op Political and Social Values and Attitudes (Washington, D.C.: Times Mirror Center for the People and the Press, 1991 ), section IX, Questionnaire, 91.
57
См.: Hugh Hecio and Henrik Madsen, Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1987), 314–32; Stefan Svallfors, «The Politics of Welfare Policy in Sweden: Structural Determinants and Attitudinal Cleavages», British Journal of Sociology 42 (December 1991): 609–34; Ulf Olsson, «Planning in the Swedish Welfare State», Studies in Political Economy, no. 34 (Spring 1991): 147–71; Lars Tragardh, «Swedish Model or Swedish Culture?» Critical' Review 4 (Fall 1990): 569–90; Ola Listhaug, «Macrovalues: The Nordic Countries Compared», Ada Sociologica 33, no. 3 (1990): 219–34; Barbara Hobson, «No Exit, No Voice: Women's Economic Dependency and the Welfare State», Ada Sociologica 33, no.3 (1990): 235–50; Sidney Verba, Steven Kelman, Gary R. Orren, Ichiro Miyake, Joji Watanuki, Ikuo Kabashima, and G. Donald Ferree, Jr., Elites and the Idea of Equality: A Comparison of Japan. Sweden, and the United States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987), 71–276; M. Donald Hancock, Sweden: The Politics of Postindustrial Change (Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press, 1972), 36–88; Richard M. Coughlin, Ideology. Public Opinion and Welfare Policy: Altitudes toward Taxes and Spending in Industrialized Societies (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1980); Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr., The Political Economy of Industrial Democracies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987), 241–57; Hans F. Dahl, «Those Equal Folk», Daedalus ИЗ (Winter 1984): 93–107.
58
Gunnar Wallin, «Towards the Integrated and Fragmented State: The Mixed Role of Local Government», West European Politics 14 (July 1991): 96–121; Jon Pierre, «Central State, Local Government, and the Market: Industrial Policy and Structural Change in Japan and Sweden», European Journal of Political Research 20 (July 1991): 1—19; Bo Rothstein, «Marxism, Institutional Analysis, and Working–Class Power: The Swedish Case», Politics and Society 18 (September 1990): 317–45; Jonas Pontusson, «Labor, Corporatism, and Industrial Policy: The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective», Comparative Politics 23 (January 1991): 163—79.
59
