Юрий Низовцев - Everything and nothingness
Any living creature that is in the current life "inside" of this world, naturally, perceives it objectively, i.e. it isn't capable anything to change in the world, it cannot manage by this world, similar soldier in the computer game, but, unlike the soldier, no one has control over any living being in this world – it does everything itself, however obeying to a certain extent the fixed rules. It cannot, for example, cancel the law of conservation of energy, chemical bonds of elements, own metabolism, limitation of life of a body in the conditions of environment or condensation of time with development of all live.
For clarification, we note that there is nothing surprising in the transformation by the sense organs and processing centers of the living being of the own high-frequency base and the frequency base of things into the macrocosm, known to us, in which the living beings can exist, breed and develop, inasmuch depending on the conditions the wave material formations may manifest along with that the properties of corpuscles. This occurs in the surrounding of the living beings which form the environment, suitable for life.
Above we have answered questions, posed by Heidegger: “… (1) whether any entities which supposedly “transcend our consciousness”; (2) whether this of the “external world” can be adequately proved; (3) how far this entity, if it is Real, is to be known in its Being-in-itself; (4) what the meaning of this entity, Reality, signifies in general…” [4, p. 245-246].
These answers can be summarized so.
If the transcendental is what is inaccessible to the human empirical knowledge, then as the achievable really for the person is that appears in front of him and into him in three-dimensional measurement through his sense organs and that he is able to "split" with the help of his intellect during existence of each human civilization. Such is reality in which the person exists.
All the rest is inaccessible to the person, however thus it isn't necessary to forget that to the single consciousness, which forms all measurements of beingness, they, naturally, are available, but in the form of the representing (being) into which each individual consciousness tries to penetrate for comprehending of essence of each thing according to own level of development
This process lasts infinitely, inasmuch Uniform, as "supplier" of things, has no borders, and form-building abilities of the single consciousness are incessantly improved in beingness. Therefore the question of cognition should be put differently: whether is possible the limit to cognition of things by consciousness?
And the answer to it consists in lack of opportunity of something inaccessible to the single consciousness. inasmuch consciousness itself forms, as a result, beingness according to own understanding; but consciousness along with that uses the infinite "depth" of Uniform and variety of things from Uniform, thanks to what consciousness into own uncountable particles can infinitely develop changing itself with change of each of them.
In this respect the reality of the world can be considered as proved if not to rely only on the person who is just one of numerous representatives of consciousness in measurements of beingness, but to keep in mind consciousness, forming to itself beingness for life and development on the basis of Uniform in the finite infinitely what actually makes the meaning of this beingness.
Heidegger, contrary to Hegel, believes beingness as substantiality, which doesn't need any other entities: “Substantiality is the idea of Being to which the ontological characterization of the res extensa harks back. “Per substantium nihil aliud intelligere possumus, quam rem quae ita existit, ut nulla alia re indigeat ad existendum.” “By substance we can understand nothing else than an entity which is in such a way that it needs no other entity in order to be.” The being of a “substance” is characterized by not needing anything” [4, p. 125].
Feeling limitation of beingness constructed on thingness and not understanding from where things come as well as how things are retained in beingness, Heidegger, as well as most of thinkers up to him, comes to God: “Substantia quae nulla plane re indigeat unica tantum potest intelligi, nempe Deus (Substance, which isn't needing in any thing absolutely, can be thought only as one, namely God)… Alias vero omnes (res), non nisi ope concursus Dei existeri posse percipimus (But all other (things), we notice, can't exist differently as needing the help of God)… All entities other than God need to be “produced” in the widest sense and also to be sustained” [4, p. 125].
Thereby Heidegger believes that beingness is relatively autonomous structure which is made and sustained by God.
At the same time, believing this explanation of beingness by insufficient and banal, Heidegger comes back to the person, whose substance, in his opinion, is the existence in this reality: “Entities with Dasein's kind of Being cannot be conceived in terms of Reality and substantiality; we have expressed this by the thesis that the substance of man is existence. Yet if we have Interpreted existentiality as care and distinguished this form Reality. This does not signify that our existential analнtic as in end; we have merely allowed the intricate problems in the question of Being and its possible modes, and the question of the meaning of such modifications, to emerge more sharply: only if the understanding of Being is, do entities as entities become accessible; only if entities are of Dasein's kind of Being is the understanding of Being possible as an entity” [4, p. 255-256].
Heidegger's mistake consists that he tries to link beingness with existence of the person, whereas the person is only an intermediate form, some kind of sign, more precisely, the tool through which consciousness exists and acts, using his sense organs for realization of itself in the uncountable finite human and other lives, thereby acquiring not only the life, but also development on each stage, which is determined by itself individual consciousness.
We believe that beingness in the form of the copies of things from Uniform, merging in each individual consciousness in flow, motion, is formed by single consciousness through sense organs and processing centers of each carrier of consciousness. Thus in consciousness of the person, owing to loss a pause between positions of copying, emerges current time, space and copies of things, inasmuch themselves things are inseparable, or rather, they are merged in infinite Uniform.
Things in an information-frequency form, i.e. in the form of copies, are "allocated" consistently from Uniform, forming not a number of the forms existing together, not travelling wave, but only one form which is completely replaced with another close to previous, i.e. is updated with the interval which is required on updating, and so on.
This consistently updated frequency structure, of course, is not a thing in the true sense of the word – it is its prototype, inasmuch the passive, merged in Uniform, manages to be "allocate" in consistently changing form that means the temporal character of the projection and opportunity the further transformation of these discrete high-frequency wave changes to corpuscular, separate things.
In particular, these changing frequency formations become separate and rather steady only in consciousness of the living being, for example, person thanks to the connection in him consecutive positions (moments) of update of a holographic projection – this is the cause that things acquire motion and change in arising thereby space. If time (consciousness) disappears – there will be neither things, nor space.
Therefore Heidegger incorrectly qualifies the space: “Space is not in the subject, nor is the world in space” [4, p. 146].
A holographic projection of Uniform is the superhigh-frequency updated structure which is formed, being updated, by single consciousness in own set through sense organs of the living beings on the basis of Uniform and it is presented to each individual consciousness in own carrier in accordance with his sense organs, creating his "now".
We, as people, know only yourself and your sense organs, which present us beingness as temporal-spatial-corporeal world in motion in the three spatial dimensions. However space doesn't exist "under" this reality, presented to us, separately from time, things and living beings inasmuch living beings "produce" it on the basis of Uniform by own sense organs with the hidden help of the single consciousness.
At this, "velocity of flow" of time depends on the volume of information coming to the individual consciousness through sense organs, inasmuch own time of the person is the information process, representing itself the copying of material objects, surrounding of the person, by means of his sense organs in the form of irreversible sequence of the discrete, information-bearing durations, being merged in the human consciousness and in the consciousness of any living being into a picture of incessantly changing surrounding. And all these changes depend not on some arbitrary stream of things what is impossible for the passive, inasmuch information copies of things from Uniform are initially motionless and invariable, but these changes depend on consciousness: all things are identified and copied by consciousness in the sequence of its address to Uniform in accordance with its own form-building abilities.
With development of the living in more sophisticated and diverse beings the flow of time is accelerated, reaching the maximum values with the advent of civilization of reasonable beings, as a consequence their conscious actions. Growth of speed of emergence of new information and, accordingly, its volume leads, finally, a civilization to information collapse and disintegration. [16, chapter 5]
There are no living beings – carriers of consciousness, – there is no information process of copying also, i.e. exception of the living beings, or – consciousness out of beingness signifies impossibility of existence of beingness in any form.
Berkeley and Gusserl refused to link activity of active "substance" or in our interpretation – material multiple-united holographic copies of consciousness, with manifestation of "matter", or in our interpretation – copies of the passive from Uniform which exist, being updated consistently discretely by multiple-united consciousness in the form of material holographic formations as copies of objects from Uniform, identified by consciousness, as the sole tool of retaining of Uniform from "falling" into oblivion, which does timeless Uniform as perceived in the form of updated copies of things from Uniform, identified by consciousness in accordance with to form-building abilities of consciousness.
Result – ensuring manifestation of eternal Uniform, potentially containing everything, including consciousness, through a holographic projection to the finite, real worlds with consciousness in live, temporary beings. Duality of this timeless formation and along with that the formation, which is situated in time, is permission of an internal contradiction of Uniform, containing potentially the passive and the active.
Hegel also, understanding that the objective world couldn't be formed in itself, but, without representing "mechanism" of its formation, comes willy-nilly to the simplest explanation, namely: the objective world, i.e. "“… reality is that ideality in which he (subjective spirit) cognizes itself” [17, p. 194].
Thus Hegel, like religion, uses a vague and blank expression the "ideal", and he counterposes the ideal to the material, whereas the "ideal" does not mean anything, except that it is something incorporeal, perfect, universal, complete and abstract. All these definitions have no relation to objective reality, and about the external in relation to a givens we know nothing, and even if to assume that there exists something the perfect then it is nothingness for us, inasmuch it is out of time, i.e. it does not exist as a separate.
Mach and Avenarius have also expressed doubts about the existence of things beyond the sensations. For example, Mach has formulated this idea as follows: “Sensations are not “symbols of things”. The “thing” is rather a mental symbol for a complex of sensations of relative stability” [15, p. 473]; Avenarius has reflected this idea by the words: “… sensation is given us with more certainty than is substantiality” [3, §91].
As for the material, it in some way is opposite to the ideal inasmuch unites in itself all types and forms what has density, taking a place; has the energy connecting all things; as well as is subordinated to these or those regularities. As it seems, it is possible to live and develop in it, inasmuch it is situated in time which is a condition for spatial distribution of things in their change. However from where undertakes time and consciousness if to imply under it a certain active beginning, unlike another passive matter.
Each thing in these material worlds and measurements, as and these worlds, is the finite in own existence, except the "thing" which belongs to the active, but not to the passive matter. The active is the finite (temporarily) only in "combination" with the passive, but it is infinite in own existence through discrete updating so how itself forms the real worlds. This is more thoroughly described below.
Each individual consciousness in our world is content with the existing manifested, but, unlike consciousness of the living beings without self-consciousness– from bacteria to primates – consciousness of the person is capable to go deep into essence of the manifested though it has no opportunity to get to other measurements with other manifestations and other regularities.
However potentially, each individual consciousness of the person as region of the hologram has an access to any another region of the hologram and to full coverage of all hologram. Possibility of realization of similar access means the overcoming of a barrier of sensations of carriers of consciousness, on insuperability which pointed Berkeley.
And if we discuss these problems here, this type of barrier isn't completely insuperable that in itself proves the holographic basis of our world.
The incorporeal is something without signs of at least some basis, i.e. nothingness, or non-existences. "Nothingness" can "avoid" non-existence only if it is everything as the eternal and infinite Uniform and along with that is detected in time as the finite in infinity.
Each person understands, what he any moment of the life willy-nilly is address outward (something external), which hardly is empty, but, what is this external and from where appears everything what our sense organs are "touched"?
Apparently, sensations meet with some basis and not just "Nothingness" though it is impossible to prove by the means which are available for us; but nevertheless this basis is manifested in boundary situations for the person, for example, at the moment of his death at casual circumstances in a car accident, the falling of bricks on his head, and so on.
Therefore the foundation is there and sensations of the person are addressed to it and perceive this aught, and it does not necessarily have to be the same as the person himself, as his consciousness, and along with that the subject existing irrespective of consciousness. Could it be quite strange situation, when things and is, and along with that things don't exist?
Such opportunity appears only if everything is merged together in infinity in which there is no time. In principle, the subject world can be "derived" in the existence from the infinite which represents by itself both everything, and nothing, however things, which are merged together in the eternal, in the original can't "pull out" from there if even there is a possibility to identify them.
